Saturday, August 25, 2012

The Disruptive Child: How to Help and not Hurt Them ( Bullying Prevention Lesson Plans )

Bullying Prevention Lesson Plans

Disruptive behavior is any behavior that will prevent an instructor from teaching, thus preventing his or her students from learning as much as they need to in class. A child whose unacceptable behavior is repeated or continuous must be corrected, but with these particular children, it seems as though nothing works. However, there are the less common occasions when a teacher may have to deal with a student because of a single disruptive event. There is a significant difference between dealing with a disruptive child who is consistently disruptive, and dealing with a student who has displayed inappropriate and disruptive behavior only once.

There are always reasons underlying a student's behavior. If a child has been disruptive once in class, it may be that something about that day upset the child emotionally, perhaps at home or on the playground etc., which caused a disruptive reaction. By the same token, if a child is always disruptive there is likely a more deep-seeded problem involved. For example: trouble at home, some sort of undiagnosed disorder, problems with not being accepted or being bullied by other students. Therefore, dealing with a disruptive student is going to have to be carefully executed.

As teachers, we must remember that even though it is incredibly frustrating to have a child continuously interfering with your lesson plans--it may be that that student is suffering just as much if not more than you or others who deal with the behavioral problems the child has. I cannot emphasize it enough; dealing with a disruptive student must be done with special care.

The typical forms of disruptive behavior are those such as a student monopolizing discussions, talking in class, trying to change the subject, coming to class late or leaving class early, sleeping in class, eating in class when not allowed, and passing notes etc. Correcting the behavior of a child who is an extrovert and seems to just be hungry for attention is different than dealing with a disruptive student who displays more introvert-like behaviors such as sleeping in class, coming late and leaving early--or just leaving class at random during the school day.

If you do not already, think of your students as little people, and their disruptive behavior as a sign of something wrong--like a fever or a cough would indicate some kind of illness.

Not to say that such a student should be without punishment. Sometimes the punishments need to be severe--if for no other reason than to continue class as planned. But this sort of severe punishment, i.e. expulsion, suspension, long hours of detention etc. should (and of course, on a case-by-case basis) be coupled with trying to get the child some help, if it seems as though there is an underlying issue at hand.

Many schools offer student counseling, and if this is not enough--you may want to meet with the parents. However, be very careful not to put the child's parents on the defensive. Try to find out if the problem may be related to something at home, while at the same time speaking to them in a non-accusatory fashion--this can be tricky. As another staff member or the principal to sit in on the meeting, so that no false accusations against the teacher can be made. Sadly, this does occur.

Then there are the other kinds of misbehavior. When a disruptive student makes threats--whether they are made against a student, a faculty member or staff member, there is almost certainly a problem regarding violence in the student's life, whether at home or in their social interactions. If a student is threatened that he or she might be beaten up, whether by bullies or by a parent or guardian--he or she is likely to imitate this type of behavior elsewhere. A child exposed to yelling and screaming and constant fighting at home, may have trouble not doing the same in a social situation--or these things can have a reverse effect, and the child will withdraw him or herself, not care about the work or the grades or anything else. So the "how to" is a big and difficult decision to make when dealing such students and every case is different.

On the upside, it is quite possible that a teacher can enable their troubled student to have a better overall life if this kind of problem is taken care of in a timely fashion, before the disruptive behavior is embedded in the child permanently. Thus, sometimes your actions will require the assistance some of the other faculty--especially a guidance counselor--or another type of social work professional (even from outside the school) to decide what is the best thing to do.

Despite the fact that dealing with a problem student is often dealing with a person who is legitimately troubled--there are, unfortunately by no fault of their own, very nasty behaviors that can come along with an unfair and unfortunate life.

For example: if you meet with a disruptive student to discuss his or her problems--you should probably have another person present. The reason for having more than one adult there when you are dealing with a disruptive student is partly that the student may become angry with you. The student may lie and say that you hurt or threatened him or her--which can escalate into a much more serious problem legally.

One warning, however, is that you seriously consider NOT having the parent, parents or guardian of the child be the third party in discussion, in case the problem does indeed stem from the home environment. If this is so--the child may freeze up and not say a word around with his parent(s) or guardian(s) present--leaving you concerned and giving you nothing to go on.



How to handle a troubled student may very well be one of the most difficult challenges you will face as a teacher. But do not give up. All of your students need the support and love of the adults who take care of them--and that means you, directly, for about six hours out of the day five days a week.

The most important advice I can give you in regards to dealing with a disruptive student is--try not to get frustrated or upset. Be the adult. And set your goal to help the student as best you can.

Anne Clarke writes numerous articles for websites on gardening, parenting, fashion, education and home decor. Her background includes teaching and gardening. For more of her articles on education please visit Teaching Supplies.
Bullying Prevention Lesson Plans

Violence in Schools ( Bullying Prevention Lesson Plans )

Bullying Prevention Lesson Plans

School violence has been identified as an increasing problem facing all members of school communities. Intervention programs have been developed to combat this ever increasing problem, with varying levels of effectiveness. Following, individualised and generic intervention programs which aim to reduce the incidence of school violence will be discussed in relation to issues such as cost, cultural fit, power, training, acceptability, and involvement.

Both individualised and generic intervention programs aim to reduce the incidence of school violence and create a safe and secure learning environment. In which staff and students are protected from all forms of violence. Bullying and aggression occur more frequently in schools where there are unclear standards of behaviour, inconsistent methods of discipline, inadequate supervision and lack of awareness of children as individuals (Pearce, 1991, p76). Generic intervention programs may address issues relating to methods of discipline and supervision but less often address issues relating to the children as individuals. Individualised intervention programs address the specific learning, social and emotional needs of the student rather than the wider school community. Individualised intervention programs also address issues relating to discipline and supervision of the target student.

Generic intervention programs appear to have limited scope when addressing the effects of violent episodes on victims and witnesses. Generic programs may be less effective in addressing the specific needs of the victim as they are typically general in nature and not developed for the specific and individual needs of particular students. Individualised intervention programs address the specific needs of the victims within the specific school context. Therefore, individualised intervention programs are likely to be more effective in addressing the effects of violence for those involved, including the victims of violent episodes. Intervention programs, either individualised or generic, which require the abuser to make amends, are effective in reducing further incidents (Pearce, 1991).

Some teachers commonly use emotional maltreatment along with punitive practices to discipline and punish students for unwanted behaviour (Briggs & Hawkins, 1997, p34). Abuse perpetrated by teachers often occurs within a school climate where violence and aggression is tolerated (Saudermann, Jaffe & Schieck, 1996, p5). A generic intervention program may be effective in changing the culture of the school and impacting on expectations of acceptable professional behaviours. However, the changes required to limit the abuse by teachers may happen over time as the culture of the school improves. An individualised intervention program would also be effective in reducing incidents of abuse by teachers, although changes in abusive behaviours should occur more rapidly. Both generic and individualised intervention programs can provide abusive teachers with new strategies for managing students' behaviour thus reducing the incidence of violence and abuse.

Due to its broad focus generic intervention programs may not meet the needs of the students that it is targeting. A 'one size fits all' approach may not meet the specific needs of students, teachers, parents or community because of its generic nature. A generic intervention program strives to create a school environment that is warm and interesting and has clearly defined limits regarding behaviour. The program fosters consistent, non-violent strategies to address violations of the school rules (Olweus, 1994). Generic intervention programs mainly utilise staff already available at a school, including parents or caregivers, school administration, teachers and students (Olweus, 1994). These program and of others like it aim to reduce maladjustment and violence by providing at risk students with alternative, pro-social attention (Jackson, 2002, p115).

Individualised intervention programs are developed according to identified needs of individual students. They are very costly as they require intensive observation and investigation as to the context and the purpose of the misbehaviour. They require the ongoing support of specialists in Functional Behaviour Analysis (FBA). The FBA is the process of identifying events that predict violent episodes and maintain that behaviour (March, 2002). Specialists may be required to complete the behaviour analysis and to develop a plan of action to address the violent episodes. They may require extra staff to assist teachers in development and implementation of the program. Using an FBA to develop an individualised intervention program, whilst being effective, is costly and requires the use of non-school based specialists or highly trained specialist teachers.

Alternatively, generic intervention programs which are commercially available are less expensive for schools to purchase and implement. They may require a training component, but this is usually an isolated period of training for those involved. Research has shown (March & Homer, 2002) that these one off teacher training programs are not likely to generate skills that teachers can use and maintain in various classroom settings. Teachers require meaningful and regular training in the strategies outlined in the intervention program for it to be successful. Generally, generic intervention programs are able to be effectively implemented by classroom teachers with limited training in violence reduction strategies.

Antecedent-based interventions, a type of individualised program, are effective in reducing violent episodes at school and therefore reduce the need for punitive consequences to violence (Kern, 2002 p 113). They address the environmental issues that contribute to violence occurring within a school or classroom setting. The Antecedent-based interventions are similar to the FBA, a component of an individual intervention program, as they address the specific needs of individuals and the factors that contribute to violent episodes occurring within a particular setting. These individualised intervention programs have been identified as being effective in reducing school violence by limiting the identified environmental factors that contribute to violent episode's with targeted students.

Many generic intervention programs are long term and may take several years to see meaningful improvements and changes in the school culture, as well as a reduction in violent episodes. Teachers may find an increased workload due to increased expectations (Saudermann, Jaffe & SchieckSaudermann, Jaffe & Schieck, 1996, p9).

Individualised intervention programs are designed to address the specific needs of the target individuals. They are developed using specific data which informs the type of program that needs to be implemented. Individualised intervention programs access specific information through meaningful investigation of the behaviours of those students involved. A hypothesis is developed regarding the function the violence performs and the intervention is developed to specifically address this need. Generic intervention programs generally do not address why a particular student is violent and therefore run the risk of failing to meet their specific needs. They provide a band aid solution to prevent and reduce violent incidents in general. All students exhibiting similar behaviours will receive similar intervention (March, 2002, p159), without addressing the cause of the violence and the student's specific emotional, social and academic needs.

Generic intervention programs usually involved teaching those involved skills to reduce the level of school violence. These may include conflict resolution and peer mediation for the students and new strategies to manage student's behaviour for teachers. The skills taught during the intervention are not usually transferred by students into other contexts, therefore are far less likely to reduce violence. Generic intervention programs may include a proactive prevention section which outlines procedures, lessons and supervision ideas to prevent violence actually occurring within school contexts. This may include instruction relating to the development of effective social skills. Social skills should be taught, as part of an intervention, with effective instructional techniques (Scott, Nelson & Liaupsin, 2001), to maximise the enhancement of student's pro-social behaviours. Individualised intervention programs may also include opportunities for students to develop social skills which may enhance their school experience, skills that are useful in many contexts.

Behaviour mapping programs encourage students to identify and understand their non-productive behaviours and explore more appropriate alternatives (Unruth, Anderson & Bartscher, 1997). This encourages students to become more aware of their behaviour and to make choices about how they want to behave. Behaviour Mapping is an effective generic intervention program that is tailored to the individual student's behavioural needs. It requires a skilled, knowledgeable and committed teacher to implement the program effectively.

Some generic intervention programs by nature must be general and include information that is aimed at the dominant white middle class student. These programs may therefore exclude students who don't form part of the dominant school culture. (Hyman & Snook, p134) These programs may contain a lot of assumed knowledge, behaviours and expectation which may be unfamiliar to some students. This may render the intervention program ineffective for those students. An individualised intervention program should be tailored to the specific cultural and language needs of the student. To be effective, an intervention program should be culturally inclusive and be accessible for all targeted students.

Peer violence can be related to a variety of causes, including family, individual and school factors (Saudermann, Jaffe & Schieck, 1996, p4). Intervention programs should therefore address these factors if they are to be real successful. Generic programs to reduce school violence are often limited in their scope and only address individual and school factors. Family factors which may contribute to peer violence within schools are rarely addressed in generic intervention programs. Studies indicate that aggressive behaviour is elevated in children who witness violence within the home (Jaffe, Wolfe & Wilson, 1990). Therefore, family factors must be addressed for any intervention program to be successful. Peer abuse may relate to a power imbalance between the abuser and the victim (Sudermann, Jaffe & Schieck, 1996, p2). Therefore, intervention programs should include opportunities for students to develop interpersonal skills and self esteem.
Research has identified that intervention programs that emphasise punishment, control and zero tolerance are ineffective at preventing school violence and may even contribute to antisocial behaviours occurring (Leone, et al 2000). Teachers are in a powerful position to reduce the incidence of school violence through their use of appropriate behaviour management strategies, providing adequate supervision and an engaging curriculum. They can also attain this position by establishing an environment where violence of any kind in unacceptable and students are treated respectfully. According to Scott, Nelson & Liaupsin (2001), students who are successful in school have little incentive to engage in behaviours that might typically result in their exclusion from school. Long term generic intervention programs with multiple components which include conflict resolution, values education, cultural education, positive discipline and effective communication that is aimed at teachers, staff, students, and parents are powerful in changing the school's culture (Smith, Duaric, Miller & Robinson, 2002, p574).

Effective academic instruction has also been identified as a strategy to help prevent school violence. Scott, Nelson & Liaupsin (2001) contend that by creating schools that facilitate student success, the goal of improving school safety will also be addressed. Therefore, teachers must provide an academically challenging environment in which positive interpersonal relationships are fostered.

There are many programs that can be implemented across school level or to target individuals to reduce incidents of violence at school. Certainly there are many commercially available intervention programs available for schools to choose from. It is important that programs are identified and implemented that are appropriate to the school culture, are acceptable within the wider community, involve parents. Individualised intervention programs are invaluable for creating behavioural change for students exhibiting serious aggressive behaviour. A generic intervention program may be effective in preventing and addressing violence across a whole school level by encouraging students to develop effective and pro-social interpersonal skills.

Often through early experiences with family, schools, media, peers and community children learn that violence, rather than communication or negotiation, is an appropriate way to solve interpersonal problems WHO/UNESCO, 1999, p2).

Samantha is a qualified Early Childhood teacher with 10 years experience. She is currently studying Master of education. She is the mother of 2 young boys. Although parenting is her main focus, furthering her understandings about how children learn and develop is something of great interest to her. She is interested in parenting, as a teacher, as a mother and a member of a wider community.
She believes that how we look after our children impacts on others in the world around us. For more information and articles please see [http://www.saneparenting.com]
Bullying Prevention Lesson Plans

Friday, August 24, 2012

Ways to Prevent Bullying ( Bullying Prevention Lesson Plans )

Bullying Prevention Lesson Plans

One way to prevent bullying in schools is to have parents change the way they parent their children at home. This is easier said than done. A lot of children who bully come from homes where they see violence and physical & mental abuse from their parents. Then the children think it is OK to go and do the same to other children. Usually children that come from violent or abusive homes take their anger out on other children. I think it is important for parents to ask questions and know what is going on in their child's life. Parents have to look for sign to see if their child is being bullied or bullying others. If your child is being bullied some signs you should watch for are:

- Unknown injuries
- Doesn't want to go back to school
- Looking depressed or sad
- Sudden loss of friends

If your child is bullying others some signs you should look for are:

- Getting into fights with others
- Being very aggressive
- Get in trouble frequently at school
- Wanting to be popular/look cool

Those are just some of the signs to look for. Parents should investigate any kind of behavior change in their child to make sure everything is OK.

Another way to prevent bullying is to establish an anti-bullying policy at the schools. This is important because it shows the students that there is a zero tolerance for any kind of bullying behavior. You want students to know you are providing them safe environments where they will be treated with respect know matter how different they are. Make sure the policy is communicated and understood by parents, faculty, staff, and the community. To make the policy effective it is important to have the support of everyone involved. Without every ones support it would be hard to implement. The consequences for violations should be clearly defined. Also, there should be a confidential reporting system included in the policy. That way it makes it easier for students to report incidents without the fear of retaliation. It helps students to feel more comfortable reporting incidents. If all the steps are followed an anti-bullying policy is a very effective way to prevent bullying in schools.

A third way, which kind of ties in to the anti-bullying policy, is to educate faculty, staff, and students about bullying. It is important for the faculty and staff to know what bullying is and how to deal with it because they are the role models to the students. I think schools should put the faculty and staff in workshops where they learn what bullying is, what the schools policy is, and how to enforce the rules. They would be able to ask any questions and add suggestions to the content. Once the faculty and staff have been educated they will be able to teach the students about bullying. One method to educate the students is to have the schools put the bullying topic in the lesson plan or activities.

Schools could allow students to have discussions about the topic of bullying to see how much they know about the issue. They could also allow students to do a role play or speech on how to stop bullying. I think it is important for schools to incorporate the topic of bullying into the lesson plan because it makes students aware of the issue and how to deal with it. If the issue is not discussed then students would not know how to deal with it and nobody to turn to for help. The more we educate faculty, staff, and the students, the better we can prevent bullying.
Bullying Prevention Lesson Plans